It should be FAILED when raid has not enough active disks

It can't remove the disk if there are not enough disks. For example, raid5 can't remove the
second disk. If the second disk is unplug from machine, it's better show missing and the raid
should be FAILED. It's better for administrator to monitor the raid.

Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@fb.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/Detail.c b/Detail.c
index f8dea6fd..cd26fb0f 100644
--- a/Detail.c
+++ b/Detail.c
@@ -355,9 +355,14 @@ int Detail(char *dev, struct context *c)
 	avail = xcalloc(array.raid_disks, 1);
 
 	for (d = 0; d < array.raid_disks; d++) {
-
-		if ((disks[d*2].state & (1<<MD_DISK_SYNC)) ||
-		    (disks[d*2+1].state & (1<<MD_DISK_SYNC))) {
+		char *dv, *dv_rep;
+		dv = map_dev_preferred(disks[d*2].major,
+				disks[d*2].minor, 0, c->prefer);
+		dv_rep = map_dev_preferred(disks[d*2+1].major,
+				disks[d*2+1].minor, 0, c->prefer);
+
+		if ((dv && (disks[d*2].state & (1<<MD_DISK_SYNC))) ||
+		    (dv_rep && (disks[d*2+1].state & (1<<MD_DISK_SYNC)))) {
 			avail_disks ++;
 			avail[d] = 1;
 		} else
@@ -789,7 +794,8 @@ This is pretty boring
 						       &max_devices, n_devices);
 			else
 				printf("   %s", dv);
-		}
+		} else if (disk.major | disk.minor)
+			printf("   missing");
 		if (!c->brief)
 			printf("\n");
 	}