aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2023-08-05 12:25:01 -0700
committerChristian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>2023-08-06 15:08:35 +0200
commit3e3271549670783be20e233a2b78a87a0b04c715 (patch)
treed69b551046ccb83118f1f84479a461956fd35e4d /Documentation
parent0a2c2baafa312ac4cec4f0bababedab3f971f224 (diff)
downloadlinux-3e3271549670783be20e233a2b78a87a0b04c715.tar.gz
vfs: get rid of old '->iterate' directory operation
All users now just use '->iterate_shared()', which only takes the directory inode lock for reading. Filesystems that never got convered to shared mode now instead use a wrapper that drops the lock, re-takes it in write mode, calls the old function, and then downgrades the lock back to read mode. This way the VFS layer and other callers no longer need to care about filesystems that never got converted to the modern era. The filesystems that use the new wrapper are ceph, coda, exfat, jfs, ntfs, ocfs2, overlayfs, and vboxsf. Honestly, several of them look like they really could just iterate their directories in shared mode and skip the wrapper entirely, but the point of this change is to not change semantics or fix filesystems that haven't been fixed in the last 7+ years, but to finally get rid of the dual iterators. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst5
-rw-r--r--Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst25
2 files changed, 12 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
index ed148919e11ad5..0ca479dbb1cd1f 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
@@ -551,9 +551,8 @@ mutex or just to use i_size_read() instead.
Note: this does not protect the file->f_pos against concurrent modifications
since this is something the userspace has to take care about.
-->iterate() is called with i_rwsem exclusive.
-
-->iterate_shared() is called with i_rwsem at least shared.
+->iterate_shared() is called with i_rwsem held for reading, and with the
+file f_pos_lock held exclusively
->fasync() is responsible for maintaining the FASYNC bit in filp->f_flags.
Most instances call fasync_helper(), which does that maintenance, so it's
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
index d2d684ae77984f..0f5da78ef4f905 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ vfs_readdir() is gone; switch to iterate_dir() instead
**mandatory**
-->readdir() is gone now; switch to ->iterate()
+->readdir() is gone now; switch to ->iterate_shared()
**mandatory**
@@ -693,24 +693,19 @@ parallel now.
---
-**recommended**
+**mandatory**
-->iterate_shared() is added; it's a parallel variant of ->iterate().
+->iterate_shared() is added.
Exclusion on struct file level is still provided (as well as that
between it and lseek on the same struct file), but if your directory
has been opened several times, you can get these called in parallel.
Exclusion between that method and all directory-modifying ones is
still provided, of course.
-Often enough ->iterate() can serve as ->iterate_shared() without any
-changes - it is a read-only operation, after all. If you have any
-per-inode or per-dentry in-core data structures modified by ->iterate(),
-you might need something to serialize the access to them. If you
-do dcache pre-seeding, you'll need to switch to d_alloc_parallel() for
-that; look for in-tree examples.
-
-Old method is only used if the new one is absent; eventually it will
-be removed. Switch while you still can; the old one won't stay.
+If you have any per-inode or per-dentry in-core data structures modified
+by ->iterate_shared(), you might need something to serialize the access
+to them. If you do dcache pre-seeding, you'll need to switch to
+d_alloc_parallel() for that; look for in-tree examples.
---
@@ -930,9 +925,9 @@ should be done by looking at FMODE_LSEEK in file->f_mode.
filldir_t (readdir callbacks) calling conventions have changed. Instead of
returning 0 or -E... it returns bool now. false means "no more" (as -E... used
to) and true - "keep going" (as 0 in old calling conventions). Rationale:
-callers never looked at specific -E... values anyway. ->iterate() and
-->iterate_shared() instance require no changes at all, all filldir_t ones in
-the tree converted.
+callers never looked at specific -E... values anyway. -> iterate_shared()
+instances require no changes at all, all filldir_t ones in the tree
+converted.
---