aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGang He <ghe@suse.com>2020-06-01 21:45:29 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2020-06-02 10:59:05 -0700
commit912f655d78c5d4ad05eac287f23a435924df7144 (patch)
treefb3448ec94b6c63c27b961e94bf3f6176d9585b1 /fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c
parent8f745e62a1926e57a671b0841241b60e80903dda (diff)
downloadlinux-912f655d78c5d4ad05eac287f23a435924df7144.tar.gz
ocfs2: mount shared volume without ha stack
Usually we create and use a ocfs2 shared volume on the top of ha stack. For pcmk based ha stack, which includes DLM, corosync and pacemaker services. The customers complained they could not mount existent ocfs2 volume in the single node without ha stack, e.g. single node backup/restore scenario. Like this case, the customers just want to access the data from the existent ocfs2 volume quickly, but do not want to restart or setup ha stack. Then, I'd like to add a mount option "nocluster", if the users use this option to mount a ocfs2 shared volume, the whole mount will not depend on the ha related services. the command will mount the existent ocfs2 volume directly (like local mount), for avoiding setup the ha stack. Signed-off-by: Gang He <ghe@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com> Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn> Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200423053300.22661-1-ghe@suse.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c46
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c b/fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c
index 8caeceeaeda7c7..4da0e4b1e79bf0 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c
@@ -254,14 +254,16 @@ static int __ocfs2_find_empty_slot(struct ocfs2_slot_info *si,
int i, ret = -ENOSPC;
if ((preferred >= 0) && (preferred < si->si_num_slots)) {
- if (!si->si_slots[preferred].sl_valid) {
+ if (!si->si_slots[preferred].sl_valid ||
+ !si->si_slots[preferred].sl_node_num) {
ret = preferred;
goto out;
}
}
for(i = 0; i < si->si_num_slots; i++) {
- if (!si->si_slots[i].sl_valid) {
+ if (!si->si_slots[i].sl_valid ||
+ !si->si_slots[i].sl_node_num) {
ret = i;
break;
}
@@ -456,24 +458,30 @@ int ocfs2_find_slot(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
spin_lock(&osb->osb_lock);
ocfs2_update_slot_info(si);
- /* search for ourselves first and take the slot if it already
- * exists. Perhaps we need to mark this in a variable for our
- * own journal recovery? Possibly not, though we certainly
- * need to warn to the user */
- slot = __ocfs2_node_num_to_slot(si, osb->node_num);
- if (slot < 0) {
- /* if no slot yet, then just take 1st available
- * one. */
- slot = __ocfs2_find_empty_slot(si, osb->preferred_slot);
+ if (ocfs2_mount_local(osb))
+ /* use slot 0 directly in local mode */
+ slot = 0;
+ else {
+ /* search for ourselves first and take the slot if it already
+ * exists. Perhaps we need to mark this in a variable for our
+ * own journal recovery? Possibly not, though we certainly
+ * need to warn to the user */
+ slot = __ocfs2_node_num_to_slot(si, osb->node_num);
if (slot < 0) {
- spin_unlock(&osb->osb_lock);
- mlog(ML_ERROR, "no free slots available!\n");
- status = -EINVAL;
- goto bail;
- }
- } else
- printk(KERN_INFO "ocfs2: Slot %d on device (%s) was already "
- "allocated to this node!\n", slot, osb->dev_str);
+ /* if no slot yet, then just take 1st available
+ * one. */
+ slot = __ocfs2_find_empty_slot(si, osb->preferred_slot);
+ if (slot < 0) {
+ spin_unlock(&osb->osb_lock);
+ mlog(ML_ERROR, "no free slots available!\n");
+ status = -EINVAL;
+ goto bail;
+ }
+ } else
+ printk(KERN_INFO "ocfs2: Slot %d on device (%s) was "
+ "already allocated to this node!\n",
+ slot, osb->dev_str);
+ }
ocfs2_set_slot(si, slot, osb->node_num);
osb->slot_num = slot;