aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2024-05-13 13:10:48 -0700
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2024-05-13 13:10:48 -0700
commitc9f9df3f6347b33ae770747c40bae38836e3658c (patch)
tree3a4e7a54dcdeffc70d8482794207174982bfdb4d
parent1164057b3c0093240e45517d711da2d1fd86789a (diff)
parent3e9bc0472b910d4115e16e9c2d684c7757cb6c60 (diff)
downloadnet-queue-40GbE.tar.gz
Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpfHEADmain40GbE200GbE1GbE10GbE100GbE
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf 2024-05-13 We've added 3 non-merge commits during the last 2 day(s) which contain a total of 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Fix a case where syzkaller found that it's unexpectedly possible to attach a cgroup_skb program to the sockopt hooks. The fix adds missing attach_type enforcement for the link_create case along with selftests, from Stanislav Fomichev. * tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf: selftests/bpf: Add sockopt case to verify prog_type selftests/bpf: Extend sockopt tests to use BPF_LINK_CREATE bpf: Add BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB attach type enforcement in BPF_LINK_CREATE ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240513041845.31040-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/syscall.c5
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c65
2 files changed, 62 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index c287925471f68e..cb61d8880dbe03 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3985,6 +3985,11 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
* check permissions at attach time.
*/
return -EPERM;
+
+ ptype = attach_type_to_prog_type(attach_type);
+ if (prog->type != ptype)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return prog->enforce_expected_attach_type &&
prog->expected_attach_type != attach_type ?
-EINVAL : 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
index 5a4491d4edfe47..eaac83a7f388b6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ enum sockopt_test_error {
static struct sockopt_test {
const char *descr;
const struct bpf_insn insns[64];
+ enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
enum bpf_attach_type attach_type;
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type;
@@ -928,9 +929,40 @@ static struct sockopt_test {
.error = EPERM_SETSOCKOPT,
},
+
+ /* ==================== prog_type ==================== */
+
+ {
+ .descr = "can attach only BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOP",
+ .insns = {
+ /* return 1 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT,
+ .expected_attach_type = 0,
+ .error = DENY_ATTACH,
+ },
+
+ {
+ .descr = "can attach only BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOP",
+ .insns = {
+ /* return 1 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT,
+ .expected_attach_type = 0,
+ .error = DENY_ATTACH,
+ },
};
static int load_prog(const struct bpf_insn *insns,
+ enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type)
{
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
@@ -947,7 +979,7 @@ static int load_prog(const struct bpf_insn *insns,
}
insns_cnt++;
- fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT, NULL, "GPL", insns, insns_cnt, &opts);
+ fd = bpf_prog_load(prog_type, NULL, "GPL", insns, insns_cnt, &opts);
if (verbose && fd < 0)
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", bpf_log_buf);
@@ -1036,13 +1068,18 @@ static int call_getsockopt(bool use_io_uring, int fd, int level, int optname,
return getsockopt(fd, level, optname, optval, optlen);
}
-static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test, bool use_io_uring)
+static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test, bool use_io_uring,
+ bool use_link)
{
- int sock_fd, err, prog_fd;
+ int prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT;
+ int sock_fd, err, prog_fd, link_fd = -1;
void *optval = NULL;
int ret = 0;
- prog_fd = load_prog(test->insns, test->expected_attach_type);
+ if (test->prog_type)
+ prog_type = test->prog_type;
+
+ prog_fd = load_prog(test->insns, prog_type, test->expected_attach_type);
if (prog_fd < 0) {
if (test->error == DENY_LOAD)
return 0;
@@ -1051,7 +1088,12 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sockopt_test *test, bool use_io_uring)
return -1;
}
- err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, test->attach_type, 0);
+ if (use_link) {
+ err = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, test->attach_type, NULL);
+ link_fd = err;
+ } else {
+ err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, test->attach_type, 0);
+ }
if (err < 0) {
if (test->error == DENY_ATTACH)
goto close_prog_fd;
@@ -1142,7 +1184,12 @@ free_optval:
close_sock_fd:
close(sock_fd);
detach_prog:
- bpf_prog_detach2(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, test->attach_type);
+ if (use_link) {
+ if (link_fd >= 0)
+ close(link_fd);
+ } else {
+ bpf_prog_detach2(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, test->attach_type);
+ }
close_prog_fd:
close(prog_fd);
return ret;
@@ -1160,10 +1207,12 @@ void test_sockopt(void)
if (!test__start_subtest(tests[i].descr))
continue;
- ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], false),
+ ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], false, false),
+ tests[i].descr);
+ ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], false, true),
tests[i].descr);
if (tests[i].io_uring_support)
- ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], true),
+ ASSERT_OK(run_test(cgroup_fd, &tests[i], true, false),
tests[i].descr);
}