aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>2020-06-08 21:31:45 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2020-06-09 09:39:12 -0700
commit1ad87824f4cf16a7f381e1f94943a96bb7a99062 (patch)
tree3d5ced0ad64d549704fcbc2b7e3cb93edfec4518
parent3dd923f39a03dede001afe0edcc08613d5f403e5 (diff)
downloadlinux-mmp-1ad87824f4cf16a7f381e1f94943a96bb7a99062.tar.gz
um: add show_stack_loglvl()
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-37-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c24
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
index c831a1c2eb94a7..1b54b6431499b5 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
@@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable)
{
- pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
+ const char *loglvl = data;
+
+ printk("%s [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", loglvl, address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
(void *)address);
}
@@ -25,7 +27,8 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops stackops = {
.address = _print_addr
};
-void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
+void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack,
+ const char *loglvl)
{
struct pt_regs *segv_regs = current->thread.segv_regs;
int i;
@@ -39,17 +42,22 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
if (!stack)
stack = get_stack_pointer(task, segv_regs);
- pr_info("Stack:\n");
+ printk("%sStack:\n", loglvl);
for (i = 0; i < 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE; i++) {
if (kstack_end(stack))
break;
if (i && ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0))
- pr_cont("\n");
+ printk("%s\n", loglvl);
pr_cont(" %08lx", *stack++);
}
- pr_cont("\n");
+ printk("%s\n", loglvl);
+
+ printk("%sCall Trace:\n", loglvl);
+ dump_trace(current, &stackops, (void *)loglvl);
+ printk("%s\n", loglvl);
+}
- pr_info("Call Trace:\n");
- dump_trace(current, &stackops, NULL);
- pr_info("\n");
+void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
+{
+ show_stack_loglvl(task, stack, KERN_INFO);
}