aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>2024-02-26 14:32:34 +1030
committerZorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>2024-03-01 19:22:36 +0800
commit779ae21a305df5ef7133f26e02aa72d2416262ca (patch)
tree17b85da9c6d4df4af2ce4be7968f09031de8b3ca
parent00989655e212ccbbd71847c6c8cd664a38ca3999 (diff)
downloadxfstests-dev-779ae21a305df5ef7133f26e02aa72d2416262ca.tar.gz
btrfs: btrfs/224 do not assign snapshot to a subvolume qgroup
For "btrfs subvolume snapshot -i <qgroupid>", we only expect the target qgroup to be a higher level one. Assigning a 0 level qgroup to another 0 level qgroup is only going to cause confusion, and I'm planning to do extra sanity checks both in kernel and btrfs-progs to reject such behavior. So change the test case to do regular higher level qgroup assignment only. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
-rwxr-xr-xtests/btrfs/2246
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/tests/btrfs/224 b/tests/btrfs/224
index de10942fe7..611df3ab42 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/224
+++ b/tests/btrfs/224
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ assign_no_shared_test()
_check_scratch_fs
}
-# Test snapshot with assigning qgroup for submodule
+# Test snapshot with assigning qgroup for higher level qgroup
snapshot_test()
{
_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ snapshot_test()
_qgroup_rescan $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume create $SCRATCH_MNT/a >> $seqres.full
+ $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG qgroup create 1/0 $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
_ddt of="$SCRATCH_MNT"/a/file1 bs=1M count=1 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
- subvolid=$(_btrfs_get_subvolid $SCRATCH_MNT a)
- $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -i 0/$subvolid $SCRATCH_MNT/a $SCRATCH_MNT/b >> $seqres.full
+ $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -i 1/0 $SCRATCH_MNT/a $SCRATCH_MNT/b >> $seqres.full
_scratch_unmount
_check_scratch_fs