ubsan: Reintroduce signed overflow sanitizer

In order to mitigate unexpected signed wrap-around[1], bring back the
signed integer overflow sanitizer. It was removed in commit 6aaa31aeb9cf
("ubsan: remove overflow checks") because it was effectively a no-op
when combined with -fno-strict-overflow (which correctly changes signed
overflow from being "undefined" to being explicitly "wrap around").

Compilers are adjusting their sanitizers to trap wrap-around and to
detecting common code patterns that should not be instrumented
(e.g. "var + offset < var"). Prepare for this and explicitly rename
the option from "OVERFLOW" to "WRAP" to more accurately describe the
behavior.

To annotate intentional wrap-around arithmetic, the helpers
wrapping_add/sub/mul_wrap() can be used for individual statements. At
the function level, the __signed_wrap attribute can be used to mark an
entire function as expecting its signed arithmetic to wrap around. For a
single object file the Makefile can use "UBSAN_SIGNED_WRAP_target.o := n"
to mark it as wrapping, and for an entire directory, "UBSAN_SIGNED_WRAP :=
n" can be used.

Additionally keep these disabled under CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST for now.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [1]
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

1 files changed, 68 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/ubsan.c b/lib/ubsan.c
index df4f8d1354bbf..5fc107f61934c 100644
--- a/lib/ubsan.c
+++ b/lib/ubsan.c
@@ -222,6 +222,74 @@ static void ubsan_epilogue(void)
 	check_panic_on_warn("UBSAN");
 }
 
+static void handle_overflow(struct overflow_data *data, void *lhs,
+			void *rhs, char op)
+{
+
+	struct type_descriptor *type = data->type;
+	char lhs_val_str[VALUE_LENGTH];
+	char rhs_val_str[VALUE_LENGTH];
+
+	if (suppress_report(&data->location))
+		return;
+
+	ubsan_prologue(&data->location, type_is_signed(type) ?
+			"signed-integer-overflow" :
+			"unsigned-integer-overflow");
+
+	val_to_string(lhs_val_str, sizeof(lhs_val_str), type, lhs);
+	val_to_string(rhs_val_str, sizeof(rhs_val_str), type, rhs);
+	pr_err("%s %c %s cannot be represented in type %s\n",
+		lhs_val_str,
+		op,
+		rhs_val_str,
+		type->type_name);
+
+	ubsan_epilogue();
+}
+
+void __ubsan_handle_add_overflow(void *data,
+				void *lhs, void *rhs)
+{
+
+	handle_overflow(data, lhs, rhs, '+');
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ubsan_handle_add_overflow);
+
+void __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow(void *data,
+				void *lhs, void *rhs)
+{
+	handle_overflow(data, lhs, rhs, '-');
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ubsan_handle_sub_overflow);
+
+void __ubsan_handle_mul_overflow(void *data,
+				void *lhs, void *rhs)
+{
+	handle_overflow(data, lhs, rhs, '*');
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ubsan_handle_mul_overflow);
+
+void __ubsan_handle_negate_overflow(void *_data, void *old_val)
+{
+	struct overflow_data *data = _data;
+	char old_val_str[VALUE_LENGTH];
+
+	if (suppress_report(&data->location))
+		return;
+
+	ubsan_prologue(&data->location, "negation-overflow");
+
+	val_to_string(old_val_str, sizeof(old_val_str), data->type, old_val);
+
+	pr_err("negation of %s cannot be represented in type %s:\n",
+		old_val_str, data->type->type_name);
+
+	ubsan_epilogue();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ubsan_handle_negate_overflow);
+
+
 void __ubsan_handle_divrem_overflow(void *_data, void *lhs, void *rhs)
 {
 	struct overflow_data *data = _data;