aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2020-03-21 12:25:58 +0100
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2020-03-21 16:00:23 +0100
commite5d4d1756b07d9490a0269a9e68c1e05ee1feb9b (patch)
tree27a6cf91053169846adab85b04a84cb9e763d2fb /kernel/time/tick-sched.c
parent919e9e6395cfac23b7e71ed88930367459055daf (diff)
downloadlinux-e5d4d1756b07d9490a0269a9e68c1e05ee1feb9b.tar.gz
timekeeping: Split jiffies seqlock
seqlock consists of a sequence counter and a spinlock_t which is used to serialize the writers. spinlock_t is substituted by a "sleeping" spinlock on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels which breaks the usage in the timekeeping code as the writers are executed in hard interrupt and therefore non-preemptible context even on PREEMPT_RT. The spinlock in seqlock cannot be unconditionally replaced by a raw_spinlock_t as many seqlock users have nesting spinlock sections or other code which is not suitable to run in truly atomic context on RT. Instead of providing a raw_seqlock API for a single use case, open code the seqlock for the jiffies use case and implement it with a raw_spinlock_t and a sequence counter. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.120587764@linutronix.de
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-sched.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/time/tick-sched.c19
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index a792d21cac645c..4be756b88a48e8 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_t now)
return;
/* Reevaluate with jiffies_lock held */
- write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock);
+ write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
delta = ktime_sub(now, last_jiffies_update);
if (delta >= tick_period) {
@@ -91,10 +92,12 @@ static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_t now)
/* Keep the tick_next_period variable up to date */
tick_next_period = ktime_add(last_jiffies_update, tick_period);
} else {
- write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock);
+ write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
return;
}
- write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock);
+ write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
update_wall_time();
}
@@ -105,12 +108,14 @@ static ktime_t tick_init_jiffy_update(void)
{
ktime_t period;
- write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock);
+ write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
/* Did we start the jiffies update yet ? */
if (last_jiffies_update == 0)
last_jiffies_update = tick_next_period;
period = last_jiffies_update;
- write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock);
+ write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
return period;
}
@@ -676,10 +681,10 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
/* Read jiffies and the time when jiffies were updated last */
do {
- seq = read_seqbegin(&jiffies_lock);
+ seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
basemono = last_jiffies_update;
basejiff = jiffies;
- } while (read_seqretry(&jiffies_lock, seq));
+ } while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq));
ts->last_jiffies = basejiff;
ts->timer_expires_base = basemono;