diff options
| author | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> | 2023-04-10 21:04:50 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> | 2024-02-02 13:11:49 +0100 |
| commit | f123dc86388cb669c3d6322702dc441abc35c31e (patch) | |
| tree | 0a0c13a50e99141771b6ba90a1a765c90a105965 /fs/sysv | |
| parent | 85f273a6a1e492afa7309fd23fcd8cb870085f56 (diff) | |
| download | linux-f123dc86388cb669c3d6322702dc441abc35c31e.tar.gz | |
sysv: don't call sb_bread() with pointers_lock held
syzbot is reporting sleep in atomic context in SysV filesystem [1], for
sb_bread() is called with rw_spinlock held.
A "write_lock(&pointers_lock) => read_lock(&pointers_lock) deadlock" bug
and a "sb_bread() with write_lock(&pointers_lock)" bug were introduced by
"Replace BKL for chain locking with sysvfs-private rwlock" in Linux 2.5.12.
Then, "[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix" in Linux 2.6.8 fixed the
former bug by moving pointers_lock lock to the callers, but instead
introduced a "sb_bread() with read_lock(&pointers_lock)" bug (which made
this problem easier to hit).
Al Viro suggested that why not to do like get_branch()/get_block()/
find_shared() in Minix filesystem does. And doing like that is almost a
revert of "[PATCH] err1-40: sysvfs locking fix" except that get_branch()
from with find_shared() is called without write_lock(&pointers_lock).
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+69b40dc5fd40f32c199f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=69b40dc5fd40f32c199f
Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0d195f93-a22a-49a2-0020-103534d6f7f6@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/sysv')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/sysv/itree.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/sysv/itree.c b/fs/sysv/itree.c index 410ab2a44d2f6..19bcb51a22036 100644 --- a/fs/sysv/itree.c +++ b/fs/sysv/itree.c @@ -83,9 +83,6 @@ static inline sysv_zone_t *block_end(struct buffer_head *bh) return (sysv_zone_t*)((char*)bh->b_data + bh->b_size); } -/* - * Requires read_lock(&pointers_lock) or write_lock(&pointers_lock) - */ static Indirect *get_branch(struct inode *inode, int depth, int offsets[], @@ -105,15 +102,18 @@ static Indirect *get_branch(struct inode *inode, bh = sb_bread(sb, block); if (!bh) goto failure; + read_lock(&pointers_lock); if (!verify_chain(chain, p)) goto changed; add_chain(++p, bh, (sysv_zone_t*)bh->b_data + *++offsets); + read_unlock(&pointers_lock); if (!p->key) goto no_block; } return NULL; changed: + read_unlock(&pointers_lock); brelse(bh); *err = -EAGAIN; goto no_block; @@ -219,9 +219,7 @@ static int get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, struct buffer_head *b goto out; reread: - read_lock(&pointers_lock); partial = get_branch(inode, depth, offsets, chain, &err); - read_unlock(&pointers_lock); /* Simplest case - block found, no allocation needed */ if (!partial) { @@ -291,9 +289,9 @@ static Indirect *find_shared(struct inode *inode, *top = 0; for (k = depth; k > 1 && !offsets[k-1]; k--) ; + partial = get_branch(inode, k, offsets, chain, &err); write_lock(&pointers_lock); - partial = get_branch(inode, k, offsets, chain, &err); if (!partial) partial = chain + k-1; /* |