diff options
| author | David Vernet <void@manifault.com> | 2023-03-02 12:39:17 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-03-02 22:36:10 -0800 |
| commit | d56b0c461d19dae917fa0bba76cbe8ad7a44712e (patch) | |
| tree | 1cae3856e88f48de289189317f283ffda0d546d1 /Documentation/bpf | |
| parent | c45eac537bd8b4977d335c123212140bc5257670 (diff) | |
| download | linux-d56b0c461d19dae917fa0bba76cbe8ad7a44712e.tar.gz | |
bpf, docs: Fix link to netdev-FAQ target
The BPF devel Q&A documentation page makes frequent reference to the
netdev-QA page via the netdev-FAQ rst link. This link is currently
broken, as is evidenced by the build output when making BPF docs:
./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:150: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq'
./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:206: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq'
./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:231: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq'
./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:396: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq'
./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:412: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq'
Fix the links to point to the actual netdev-faq page.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302183918.54190-1-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/bpf')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst index 03d4993eda6f0..5f5f9ccc3862b 100644 --- a/Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst +++ b/Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ into the bpf-next tree will make their way into net-next tree. net and net-next are both run by David S. Miller. From there, they will go into the kernel mainline tree run by Linus Torvalds. To read up on the process of net and net-next being merged into the mainline tree, see -the :ref:`netdev-FAQ` +the `netdev-FAQ`_. @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ request):: Q: How do I indicate which tree (bpf vs. bpf-next) my patch should be applied to? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -A: The process is the very same as described in the :ref:`netdev-FAQ`, +A: The process is the very same as described in the `netdev-FAQ`_, so please read up on it. The subject line must indicate whether the patch is a fix or rather "next-like" content in order to let the maintainers know whether it is targeted at bpf or bpf-next. @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ ii) run extensive BPF test suite and Once the BPF pull request was accepted by David S. Miller, then the patches end up in net or net-next tree, respectively, and make their way from there further into mainline. Again, see the -:ref:`netdev-FAQ` for additional information e.g. on how often they are +`netdev-FAQ`_ for additional information e.g. on how often they are merged to mainline. Q: How long do I need to wait for feedback on my BPF patches? @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ Q: Are patches applied to bpf-next when the merge window is open? ----------------------------------------------------------------- A: For the time when the merge window is open, bpf-next will not be processed. This is roughly analogous to net-next patch processing, -so feel free to read up on the :ref:`netdev-FAQ` about further details. +so feel free to read up on the `netdev-FAQ`_ about further details. During those two weeks of merge window, we might ask you to resend your patch series once bpf-next is open again. Once Linus released @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ netdev kernel mailing list in Cc and ask for the fix to be queued up: netdev@vger.kernel.org The process in general is the same as on netdev itself, see also the -:ref:`netdev-FAQ`. +`netdev-FAQ`_. Q: Do you also backport to kernels not currently maintained as stable? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ Q: The BPF patch I am about to submit needs to go to stable as well What should I do? A: The same rules apply as with netdev patch submissions in general, see -the :ref:`netdev-FAQ`. +the `netdev-FAQ`_. Never add "``Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org``" to the patch description, but ask the BPF maintainers to queue the patches instead. This can be done @@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ when: .. Links .. _Documentation/process/: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/ -.. _netdev-FAQ: Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst +.. _netdev-FAQ: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html .. _selftests: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ .. _Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst: |