diff options
| author | Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> | 2005-12-21 01:29:00 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> | 2005-12-22 22:00:25 -0500 |
| commit | 75b245b3259133360845bc6de3aecb8a6bd6ab59 (patch) | |
| tree | 75db01d92dd957a2508b2c4c5bca501b75e9527d | |
| parent | b05948d9b7167e23af88cc65b9ffa4687eaf1f0d (diff) | |
| download | linux-75b245b3259133360845bc6de3aecb8a6bd6ab59.tar.gz | |
[ACPI] fix passive cooling regression
Return logic was inverted.
Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes
more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()).
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c index f37584015324ac..dc9817cfb882a8 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c @@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu) { struct cpufreq_policy policy; if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu)) - return -ENODEV; - return 0; + return 0; + return 1; } static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu) |