[PATCH] rcu lock update: Add per-cpu batch counter

From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>

Below is the one of my patches from my rcu lock update.  Jack Steiner tested
the first one on a 512p and it resolved the rcu cache line trashing.  All were
tested on osdl with STP.

Step one for reducing cacheline trashing within rcupdate.c:

The current code uses the rcu_cpu_mask bitmap both for keeping track of the
cpus that haven't gone through a quiescent state and for checking if a cpu
should look for quiescent states.  The bitmap is frequently changed and the
check is done by polling - together this causes cache line trashing.

If it's cheaper to access a (mostly) read-only cacheline than a cacheline that
is frequently dirtied, then it's possible to reduce the trashing by splitting
the rcu_cpu_mask bitmap into two cachelines:

The patch adds a generation counter and moves it into a separate cacheline.
This allows to removes all accesses to rcu_cpumask (in the read-write
cacheline) from rcu_pending and at least 50% of the accesses from
rcu_check_quiescent_state.  rcu_pending and all but one call per cpu to
rcu_check_quiescent_state access the read-only cacheline.  Probably not enough
for 512p, but it's a start, just for 128 byte more memory use, without slowing
down rcu grace periods.  Obviously the read-only cacheline is not really
read-only: it's written once per grace period to indicate that a new grace
period is running.

Tests on an 8-way Pentium III with reaim showed some improvement:

oprofile hits:
Reference: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/293075/
Hits	   %
23741     0.0994  rcu_pending
19057     0.0798  rcu_check_quiescent_state
6530      0.0273  rcu_check_callbacks

Patched: http://khack.osdl.org/stp/293076/
8291      0.0579  rcu_pending
5475      0.0382  rcu_check_quiescent_state
3604      0.0252  rcu_check_callbacks

The total runtime differs between both runs, thus the % number must
be compared: Around 50% faster. I've uninlined rcu_pending for the
test.

Tested with reaim and kernbench.

Description:

- per-cpu quiescbatch and qs_pending fields introduced: quiescbatch contains
  the number of the last quiescent period that the cpu has seen and qs_pending
  is set if the cpu has not yet reported the quiescent state for the current
  period.  With these two fields a cpu can test if it should report a
  quiescent state without having to look at the frequently written
  rcu_cpu_mask bitmap.

- curbatch split into two fields: rcu_ctrlblk.batch.completed and
  rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur.  This makes it possible to figure out if a grace
  period is running (completed != cur) without accessing the rcu_cpu_mask
  bitmap.

- rcu_ctrlblk.maxbatch removed and replaced with a true/false next_pending
  flag: next_pending=1 means that another grace period should be started
  immediately after the end of the current period.  Previously, this was
  achieved by maxbatch: curbatch==maxbatch means don't start, curbatch!=
  maxbatch means start.  A flag improves the readability: The only possible
  values for maxbatch were curbatch and curbatch+1.

- rcu_ctrlblk split into two cachelines for better performance.

- common code from rcu_offline_cpu and rcu_check_quiescent_state merged into
  cpu_quiet.

- rcu_offline_cpu: replace spin_lock_irq with spin_lock_bh, there are no
  accesses from irq context (and there are accesses to the spinlock with
  enabled interrupts from tasklet context).

- rcu_restart_cpu introduced, s390 should call it after changing nohz:
  Theoretically the global batch counter could wrap around and end up at
  RCU_quiescbatch(cpu).  Then the cpu would not look for a quiescent state and
  rcu would lock up.

Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 88 insertions, 54 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index 13a1b5a5825f69..d665d001e030f0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@
 
 /* Definition for rcupdate control block. */
 struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk = 
-	{ .mutex = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, .curbatch = 1, 
-	  .maxbatch = 1, .rcu_cpu_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE };
+	{ .batch = { .cur = -300, .completed = -300 },
+	  .state = {.mutex = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, .rcu_cpu_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE } };
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_data) = { 0L };
 
 /* Fake initialization required by compiler */
@@ -97,25 +97,59 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct list_head *list)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Grace period handling:
+ * The grace period handling consists out of two steps:
+ * - A new grace period is started.
+ *   This is done by rcu_start_batch. The start is not broadcasted to
+ *   all cpus, they must pick this up by comparing rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur with
+ *   RCU_quiescbatch(cpu). All cpus are recorded  in the
+ *   rcu_ctrlblk.state.rcu_cpu_mask bitmap.
+ * - All cpus must go through a quiescent state.
+ *   Since the start of the grace period is not broadcasted, at least two
+ *   calls to rcu_check_quiescent_state are required:
+ *   The first call just notices that a new grace period is running. The
+ *   following calls check if there was a quiescent state since the beginning
+ *   of the grace period. If so, it updates rcu_ctrlblk.state.rcu_cpu_mask. If
+ *   the bitmap is empty, then the grace period is completed.
+ *   rcu_check_quiescent_state calls rcu_start_batch(0) to start the next grace
+ *   period (if necessary).
+ */
+/*
  * Register a new batch of callbacks, and start it up if there is currently no
  * active batch and the batch to be registered has not already occurred.
- * Caller must hold the rcu_ctrlblk lock.
+ * Caller must hold the rcu_ctrlblk.state lock.
  */
-static void rcu_start_batch(long newbatch)
+static void rcu_start_batch(int next_pending)
 {
 	cpumask_t active;
 
-	if (rcu_batch_before(rcu_ctrlblk.maxbatch, newbatch)) {
-		rcu_ctrlblk.maxbatch = newbatch;
+	if (next_pending)
+		rcu_ctrlblk.state.next_pending = 1;
+
+	if (rcu_ctrlblk.state.next_pending &&
+			rcu_ctrlblk.batch.completed == rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur) {
+		rcu_ctrlblk.state.next_pending = 0;
+		/* Can't change, since spin lock held. */
+		active = nohz_cpu_mask;
+		cpus_complement(active);
+		cpus_and(rcu_ctrlblk.state.rcu_cpu_mask, cpu_online_map, active);
+		rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur++;
 	}
-	if (rcu_batch_before(rcu_ctrlblk.maxbatch, rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch) ||
-	    !cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask)) {
-		return;
+}
+
+/*
+ * cpu went through a quiescent state since the beginning of the grace period.
+ * Clear it from the cpu mask and complete the grace period if it was the last
+ * cpu. Start another grace period if someone has further entries pending
+ */
+static void cpu_quiet(int cpu)
+{
+	cpu_clear(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.state.rcu_cpu_mask);
+	if (cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.state.rcu_cpu_mask)) {
+		/* batch completed ! */
+		rcu_ctrlblk.batch.completed = rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur;
+		rcu_start_batch(0);
 	}
-	/* Can't change, since spin lock held. */
-	active = nohz_cpu_mask;
-	cpus_complement(active);
-	cpus_and(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask, cpu_online_map, active);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -127,7 +161,19 @@ static void rcu_check_quiescent_state(void)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
-	if (!cpu_isset(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
+	if (RCU_quiescbatch(cpu) != rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur) {
+		/* new grace period: record qsctr value. */
+		RCU_qs_pending(cpu) = 1;
+		RCU_last_qsctr(cpu) = RCU_qsctr(cpu);
+		RCU_quiescbatch(cpu) = rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* Grace period already completed for this cpu?
+	 * qs_pending is checked instead of the actual bitmap to avoid
+	 * cacheline trashing.
+	 */
+	if (!RCU_qs_pending(cpu))
 		return;
 
 	/* 
@@ -135,27 +181,19 @@ static void rcu_check_quiescent_state(void)
 	 * we may miss one quiescent state of that CPU. That is
 	 * tolerable. So no need to disable interrupts.
 	 */
-	if (RCU_last_qsctr(cpu) == RCU_QSCTR_INVALID) {
-		RCU_last_qsctr(cpu) = RCU_qsctr(cpu);
-		return;
-	}
 	if (RCU_qsctr(cpu) == RCU_last_qsctr(cpu))
 		return;
+	RCU_qs_pending(cpu) = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&rcu_ctrlblk.mutex);
-	if (!cpu_isset(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	cpu_clear(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask);
-	RCU_last_qsctr(cpu) = RCU_QSCTR_INVALID;
-	if (!cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch++;
-	rcu_start_batch(rcu_ctrlblk.maxbatch);
+	spin_lock(&rcu_ctrlblk.state.mutex);
+	/*
+	 * RCU_quiescbatch/batch.cur and the cpu bitmap can come out of sync
+	 * during cpu startup. Ignore the quiescent state.
+	 */
+	if (likely(RCU_quiescbatch(cpu) == rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur))
+		cpu_quiet(cpu);
 
-out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&rcu_ctrlblk.mutex);
+	spin_unlock(&rcu_ctrlblk.state.mutex);
 }
 
 
@@ -185,25 +223,11 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
 	 * we can block indefinitely waiting for it, so flush
 	 * it here
 	 */
-	spin_lock_irq(&rcu_ctrlblk.mutex);
-	if (cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask))
-		goto unlock;
-
-	cpu_clear(cpu, rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask);
-	if (cpus_empty(rcu_ctrlblk.rcu_cpu_mask)) {
-		rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch++;
-		/* We may avoid calling start batch if
-		 * we are starting the batch only
-		 * because of the DEAD CPU (the current
-		 * CPU will start a new batch anyway for
-		 * the callbacks we will move to current CPU).
-		 * However, we will avoid this optimisation
-		 * for now.
-		 */
-		rcu_start_batch(rcu_ctrlblk.maxbatch);
-	}
+	spin_lock_bh(&rcu_ctrlblk.state.mutex);
+	if (rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur != rcu_ctrlblk.batch.completed)
+		cpu_quiet(cpu);
 unlock:
-	spin_unlock_irq(&rcu_ctrlblk.mutex);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&rcu_ctrlblk.state.mutex);
 
 	rcu_move_batch(&RCU_curlist(cpu));
 	rcu_move_batch(&RCU_nxtlist(cpu));
@@ -213,6 +237,14 @@ unlock:
 
 #endif
 
+void rcu_restart_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+	spin_lock_bh(&rcu_ctrlblk.state.mutex);
+	RCU_quiescbatch(cpu) = rcu_ctrlblk.batch.completed;
+	RCU_qs_pending(cpu) = 0;
+	spin_unlock_bh(&rcu_ctrlblk.state.mutex);
+}
+
 /*
  * This does the RCU processing work from tasklet context. 
  */
@@ -222,7 +254,7 @@ static void rcu_process_callbacks(unsigned long unused)
 	LIST_HEAD(list);
 
 	if (!list_empty(&RCU_curlist(cpu)) &&
-	    rcu_batch_after(rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch, RCU_batch(cpu))) {
+			!rcu_batch_before(rcu_ctrlblk.batch.completed,RCU_batch(cpu))) {
 		__list_splice(&RCU_curlist(cpu), &list);
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&RCU_curlist(cpu));
 	}
@@ -236,10 +268,10 @@ static void rcu_process_callbacks(unsigned long unused)
 		/*
 		 * start the next batch of callbacks
 		 */
-		spin_lock(&rcu_ctrlblk.mutex);
-		RCU_batch(cpu) = rcu_ctrlblk.curbatch + 1;
-		rcu_start_batch(RCU_batch(cpu));
-		spin_unlock(&rcu_ctrlblk.mutex);
+		spin_lock(&rcu_ctrlblk.state.mutex);
+		RCU_batch(cpu) = rcu_ctrlblk.batch.cur + 1;
+		rcu_start_batch(1);
+		spin_unlock(&rcu_ctrlblk.state.mutex);
 	} else {
 		local_irq_enable();
 	}
@@ -263,6 +295,8 @@ static void __devinit rcu_online_cpu(int cpu)
 	tasklet_init(&RCU_tasklet(cpu), rcu_process_callbacks, 0UL);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&RCU_nxtlist(cpu));
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&RCU_curlist(cpu));
+	RCU_quiescbatch(cpu) = rcu_ctrlblk.batch.completed;
+	RCU_qs_pending(cpu) = 0;
 }
 
 static int __devinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,