blob: e40911c6b6eb2c9cb2aa141c9ee81e3453976a83 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
From f363fac345756e98d3c9e4911e54a077afa3e0eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:56:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] timer: delay waking softirqs from the jiffy tick
commit 3e46534547eb908c70314c173b22ae17c2e8b8e3 in tip.
People were complaining about broken balancing with the recent -rt
series.
A look at /proc/sched_debug yielded:
cpu#0, 2393.874 MHz
.nr_running : 0
.load : 0
.cpu_load[0] : 177522
.cpu_load[1] : 177522
.cpu_load[2] : 177522
.cpu_load[3] : 177522
.cpu_load[4] : 177522
cpu#1, 2393.874 MHz
.nr_running : 4
.load : 4096
.cpu_load[0] : 181618
.cpu_load[1] : 180850
.cpu_load[2] : 180274
.cpu_load[3] : 179938
.cpu_load[4] : 179758
Which indicated the cpu_load computation was hosed, the 177522 value
indicates that there is one RT task runnable. Initially I thought the
old problem of calculating the cpu_load from a softirq had re-surfaced,
however looking at the code shows its being done from scheduler_tick().
[ we really should fix this RT/cfs interaction some day... ]
A few trace_printk()s later:
sirq-timer/1-19 [001] 174.289744: 19: 50:S ==> [001] 0:140:R <idle>
<idle>-0 [001] 174.290724: enqueue_task_rt: adding task: 19/sirq-timer/1 with load: 177522
<idle>-0 [001] 174.290725: 0:140:R + [001] 19: 50:S sirq-timer/1
<idle>-0 [001] 174.290730: scheduler_tick: current load: 177522
<idle>-0 [001] 174.290732: scheduler_tick: current: 0/swapper
<idle>-0 [001] 174.290736: 0:140:R ==> [001] 19: 50:R sirq-timer/1
sirq-timer/1-19 [001] 174.290741: dequeue_task_rt: removing task: 19/sirq-timer/1 with load: 177522
sirq-timer/1-19 [001] 174.290743: 19: 50:S ==> [001] 0:140:R <idle>
We see that we always raise the timer softirq before doing the load
calculation. Avoid this by re-ordering the scheduler_tick() call in
update_process_times() to occur before we deal with timers.
This lowers the load back to sanity and restores regular load-balancing
behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
kernel/timer.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index f793f67..7fcbfd7 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -1264,10 +1264,10 @@ void update_process_times(int user_tick)
/* Note: this timer irq context must be accounted for as well. */
account_process_tick(p, user_tick);
+ scheduler_tick();
run_local_timers();
rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user_tick);
perf_event_do_pending();
- scheduler_tick();
run_posix_cpu_timers(p);
}
--
1.7.0.4
|
