summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/releases/2.6.33.20/rtl2800usb-fix-incorrect-storage-of-mac-address-on.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'releases/2.6.33.20/rtl2800usb-fix-incorrect-storage-of-mac-address-on.patch')
-rw-r--r--releases/2.6.33.20/rtl2800usb-fix-incorrect-storage-of-mac-address-on.patch47
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/releases/2.6.33.20/rtl2800usb-fix-incorrect-storage-of-mac-address-on.patch b/releases/2.6.33.20/rtl2800usb-fix-incorrect-storage-of-mac-address-on.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ee1cb84
--- /dev/null
+++ b/releases/2.6.33.20/rtl2800usb-fix-incorrect-storage-of-mac-address-on.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+From daabead1c32f331edcfb255fd973411c667977e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
+Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:50:23 -0500
+Subject: rtl2800usb: Fix incorrect storage of MAC address on big-endian platforms
+
+From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
+
+commit daabead1c32f331edcfb255fd973411c667977e8 upstream.
+
+The eeprom data is stored in little-endian order in the rt2x00 library.
+As it was converted to cpu order in the read routines, the data need to
+be converted to LE on a big-endian platform.
+
+Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
+Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
+
+---
+ drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 17 +++++++++--------
+ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
++++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c
+@@ -1694,14 +1694,15 @@ static void rt2800_efuse_read(struct rt2
+ rt2800_regbusy_read(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_CTRL, EFUSE_CTRL_KICK, &reg);
+
+ /* Apparently the data is read from end to start */
+- rt2800_register_read_lock(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA3,
+- (u32 *)&rt2x00dev->eeprom[i]);
+- rt2800_register_read_lock(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA2,
+- (u32 *)&rt2x00dev->eeprom[i + 2]);
+- rt2800_register_read_lock(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA1,
+- (u32 *)&rt2x00dev->eeprom[i + 4]);
+- rt2800_register_read_lock(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA0,
+- (u32 *)&rt2x00dev->eeprom[i + 6]);
++ rt2800_register_read_lock(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA3, &reg);
++ /* The returned value is in CPU order, but eeprom is le */
++ rt2x00dev->eeprom[i] = cpu_to_le32(reg);
++ rt2800_register_read_lock(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA2, &reg);
++ *(u32 *)&rt2x00dev->eeprom[i + 2] = cpu_to_le32(reg);
++ rt2800_register_read_lock(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA1, &reg);
++ *(u32 *)&rt2x00dev->eeprom[i + 4] = cpu_to_le32(reg);
++ rt2800_register_read_lock(rt2x00dev, EFUSE_DATA0, &reg);
++ *(u32 *)&rt2x00dev->eeprom[i + 6] = cpu_to_le32(reg);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&rt2x00dev->csr_mutex);
+ }