diff options
author | Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> | 2023-03-20 07:43:38 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> | 2023-03-21 06:01:03 +0900 |
commit | dfb3d4a9e2bdb5e89ec73147c838f15a235cc0dd (patch) | |
tree | 4b2f820949a1e3d82266fdafcb941b489a0c729e | |
parent | 6945f2925f0fbc45d9567574f8079f4587ae4fb2 (diff) | |
download | linux-devfreq-testing.tar.gz |
PM / devfreq: Teach lockdep about locking orderdevfreq-testing
This will make it easier to catch places doing allocations that can
trigger reclaim under devfreq->lock.
Because devfreq->lock is held over various devfreq_dev_profile
callbacks, there might be some fallout if those callbacks do allocations
that can trigger reclaim, but I've looked through the various callback
implementations and don't see anything obvious. If it does trigger any
lockdep splats, those should be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c index 11b774048bd2fd..5ce3bf9b59e77e 100644 --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c @@ -817,6 +817,12 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev, } mutex_init(&devfreq->lock); + + /* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */ + fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); + might_lock(&devfreq->lock); + fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); + devfreq->dev.parent = dev; devfreq->dev.class = devfreq_class; devfreq->dev.release = devfreq_dev_release; |