aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>2024-03-13 10:42:21 -0700
committerAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>2024-03-29 15:58:45 +0100
commit95c46336ab4785701a506e94fbd6256c7859be7b (patch)
tree3eaf3ca5b30208a5ad4c1dbe048796d487be7714
parent7918a220d210df91d981bd6d19fb8c26827f22ea (diff)
downloadlinux-95c46336ab4785701a506e94fbd6256c7859be7b.tar.gz
rtc: test: Split rtc unit test into slow and normal speed test
On slow systems, the rtc unit test may result in soft lockups and/or generate messages such as # rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range: Test should be marked slow (runtime: 34.253230015s) # rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range: pass:1 fail:0 skip:0 total:1 The test covers a date range of 160,000 years, resulting in the long runtime. Unit tests running for more than 1 second are supposed to be marked as slow. Just marking the test as slow would prevent it from running when slow tests are disabled, which would not be desirable. At the same time, the current test range of 160,000 years seems to be of limited value. Split the test into two parts, one covering a range of 1,000 years and the other covering the current range of 160,000 years. Mark the 160,000 year test as slow to be able to separate it from the faster test. Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313174221.1999654-1-linux@roeck-us.net Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/rtc/lib_test.c33
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
index 225c859d6da550..3893a202e9ea19 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
@@ -27,17 +27,17 @@ static void advance_date(int *year, int *month, int *mday, int *yday)
}
/*
- * Checks every day in a 160000 years interval starting on 1970-01-01
+ * Check every day in specified number of years interval starting on 1970-01-01
* against the expected result.
*/
-static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
+static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test, int years)
{
/*
- * 160000 years = (160000 / 400) * 400 years
- * = (160000 / 400) * 146097 days
- * = (160000 / 400) * 146097 * 86400 seconds
+ * years = (years / 400) * 400 years
+ * = (years / 400) * 146097 days
+ * = (years / 400) * 146097 * 86400 seconds
*/
- time64_t total_secs = ((time64_t) 160000) / 400 * 146097 * 86400;
+ time64_t total_secs = ((time64_t)years) / 400 * 146097 * 86400;
int year = 1970;
int month = 1;
@@ -66,8 +66,27 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
}
}
+/*
+ * Checks every day in a 160000 years interval starting on 1970-01-01
+ * against the expected result.
+ */
+static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range_160000(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(test, 160000);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Checks every day in a 1000 years interval starting on 1970-01-01
+ * against the expected result.
+ */
+static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range_1000(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(test, 1000);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case rtc_lib_test_cases[] = {
- KUNIT_CASE(rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range),
+ KUNIT_CASE(rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range_1000),
+ KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range_160000),
{}
};