Documentation formatting and cleanup

Following what appears to be the predominant style, format
names of commands and commandlines both as `teletype text`.

While we're at it, add articles ("a" and "the") in some
places, italicize the name of the command in the manual page
synopsis line, and add a comma or two where it seems appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@uchicago.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/git-fsck.txt b/Documentation/git-fsck.txt
index c26b40a31f..ef4ceb3dfd 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-fsck.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-fsck.txt
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ OPTIONS
 <object>::
 	An object to treat as the head of an unreachability trace.
 +
-If no objects are given, git-fsck defaults to using the
+If no objects are given, `git-fsck` defaults to using the
 index file, all SHA1 references in .git/refs/*, and all reflogs (unless
 --no-reflogs is given) as heads.
 
@@ -83,11 +83,11 @@ So for example
 
 will do quite a _lot_ of verification on the tree. There are a few
 extra validity tests to be added (make sure that tree objects are
-sorted properly etc), but on the whole if "git-fsck" is happy, you
+sorted properly etc), but on the whole if `git-fsck` is happy, you
 do have a valid tree.
 
 Any corrupt objects you will have to find in backups or other archives
-(i.e., you can just remove them and do an "rsync" with some other site in
+(i.e., you can just remove them and do an `rsync` with some other site in
 the hopes that somebody else has the object you have corrupted).
 
 Of course, "valid tree" doesn't mean that it wasn't generated by some