Autogenerated HTML docs for v1.5.6.2-212-g08b5

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/pull-fetch-param.txt b/pull-fetch-param.txt
index cbee36994..00a8d2104 100644
--- a/pull-fetch-param.txt
+++ b/pull-fetch-param.txt
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ must know this is the expected usage pattern for a branch.
 [NOTE]
 You never do your own development on branches that appear
 on the right hand side of a <refspec> colon on `Pull:` lines;
-they are to be updated by `git-fetch`.  If you intend to do
+they are to be updated by 'git-fetch'.  If you intend to do
 development derived from a remote branch `B`, have a `Pull:`
 line to track it (i.e. `Pull: B:remote-B`), and have a separate
 branch `my-B` to do your development on top of it.  The latter
@@ -44,13 +44,13 @@ on the remote branch, merge it into your development branch with
 +
 [NOTE]
 There is a difference between listing multiple <refspec>
-directly on `git-pull` command line and having multiple
+directly on 'git-pull' command line and having multiple
 `Pull:` <refspec> lines for a <repository> and running
-`git-pull` command without any explicit <refspec> parameters.
+'git-pull' command without any explicit <refspec> parameters.
 <refspec> listed explicitly on the command line are always
 merged into the current branch after fetching.  In other words,
 if you list more than one remote refs, you would be making
-an Octopus.  While `git-pull` run without any explicit <refspec>
+an Octopus.  While 'git-pull' run without any explicit <refspec>
 parameter takes default <refspec>s from `Pull:` lines, it
 merges only the first <refspec> found into the current branch,
 after fetching all the remote refs.  This is because making an