Autogenerated HTML docs for v1.6.6.1-383-g5a9f

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/pull-fetch-param.txt b/pull-fetch-param.txt
index 0551ebdfa..5dd6e5a0c 100644
--- a/pull-fetch-param.txt
+++ b/pull-fetch-param.txt
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ must know this is the expected usage pattern for a branch.
 [NOTE]
 You never do your own development on branches that appear
 on the right hand side of a <refspec> colon on `Pull:` lines;
-they are to be updated by 'git-fetch'.  If you intend to do
+they are to be updated by 'git fetch'.  If you intend to do
 development derived from a remote branch `B`, have a `Pull:`
 line to track it (i.e. `Pull: B:remote-B`), and have a separate
 branch `my-B` to do your development on top of it.  The latter
@@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ on the remote branch, merge it into your development branch with
 +
 [NOTE]
 There is a difference between listing multiple <refspec>
-directly on 'git-pull' command line and having multiple
+directly on 'git pull' command line and having multiple
 `Pull:` <refspec> lines for a <repository> and running
-'git-pull' command without any explicit <refspec> parameters.
+'git pull' command without any explicit <refspec> parameters.
 <refspec> listed explicitly on the command line are always
 merged into the current branch after fetching.  In other words,
 if you list more than one remote refs, you would be making
-an Octopus.  While 'git-pull' run without any explicit <refspec>
+an Octopus.  While 'git pull' run without any explicit <refspec>
 parameter takes default <refspec>s from `Pull:` lines, it
 merges only the first <refspec> found into the current branch,
 after fetching all the remote refs.  This is because making an