summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gitfaq.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2021-08-30 16:54:25 -0700
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2021-08-30 16:54:25 -0700
commit7a031e5c8c444cac4c199ecf6538eb89f8862071 (patch)
treebef184dc029d8342f45d83bace3deeedae0e6b7b /gitfaq.txt
parentd2e30562620c9dda7b685f4d3bcb8acab537d97c (diff)
downloadgit-htmldocs-7a031e5c8c444cac4c199ecf6538eb89f8862071.tar.gz
Autogenerated HTML docs for v2.33.0-113-g6c408
Diffstat (limited to 'gitfaq.txt')
-rw-r--r--gitfaq.txt2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gitfaq.txt b/gitfaq.txt
index afdaeab85..8c1f2d567 100644
--- a/gitfaq.txt
+++ b/gitfaq.txt
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ best to always use a regular merge commit.
[[merge-two-revert-one]]
If I make a change on two branches but revert it on one, why does the merge of those branches include the change?::
- By default, when Git does a merge, it uses a strategy called the recursive
+ By default, when Git does a merge, it uses a strategy called the `ort`
strategy, which does a fancy three-way merge. In such a case, when Git
performs the merge, it considers exactly three points: the two heads and a
third point, called the _merge base_, which is usually the common ancestor of