From: Zwane Mwaikambo William spotted this stray bit, LOCK_SECTION isn't used anymore on x86_64. Andrew i've diffed against -mm because i'd like for the irq enable on contention patch to be merged, i believe making spinlock functions out of line was a prerequisite Andi wanted before agreeing to the irq enable code. Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h | 5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff -puN include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h~remove-lock_section-from-x86_64-spin_lock-asm include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h --- 25/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h~remove-lock_section-from-x86_64-spin_lock-asm 2005-06-24 01:26:46.000000000 -0700 +++ 25-akpm/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2005-06-24 01:28:34.000000000 -0700 @@ -23,14 +23,13 @@ #define __raw_spin_lock_string \ "\n1:\t" \ "lock ; decb %0\n\t" \ - "js 2f\n" \ - LOCK_SECTION_START("") \ + "jns 3f\n" \ "2:\t" \ "rep;nop\n\t" \ "cmpb $0,%0\n\t" \ "jle 2b\n\t" \ "jmp 1b\n" \ - LOCK_SECTION_END + "3:\n\t" #define __raw_spin_unlock_string \ "movb $1,%0" \ _