Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes, and Conventions

In a perfect world, it would be possible to convert all instances of some deprecated API into the new API and entirely remove the old API in a single development cycle. However, due to the size of the kernel, the maintainership hierarchy, and timing, it’s not always feasible to do these kinds of conversions at once. This means that new instances may sneak into the kernel while old ones are being removed, only making the amount of work to remove the API grow. In order to educate developers about what has been deprecated and why, this list has been created as a place to point when uses of deprecated things are proposed for inclusion in the kernel.


While this attribute does visually mark an interface as deprecated, it does not produce warnings during builds any more because one of the standing goals of the kernel is to build without warnings and no one was actually doing anything to remove these deprecated interfaces. While using __deprecated is nice to note an old API in a header file, it isn’t the full solution. Such interfaces must either be fully removed from the kernel, or added to this file to discourage others from using them in the future.

BUG() and BUG_ON()

Use WARN() and WARN_ON() instead, and handle the “impossible” error condition as gracefully as possible. While the BUG()-family of APIs were originally designed to act as an “impossible situation” assert and to kill a kernel thread “safely”, they turn out to just be too risky. (e.g. “In what order do locks need to be released? Have various states been restored?”) Very commonly, using BUG() will destabilize a system or entirely break it, which makes it impossible to debug or even get viable crash reports. Linus has very strong feelings about this.

Note that the WARN()-family should only be used for “expected to be unreachable” situations. If you want to warn about “reachable but undesirable” situations, please use the pr_warn()-family of functions. System owners may have set the panic_on_warn sysctl, to make sure their systems do not continue running in the face of “unreachable” conditions. (For example, see commits like this one.)

open-coded arithmetic in allocator arguments

Dynamic size calculations (especially multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar) function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors. (One exception to this is literal values where the compiler can warn if they might overflow. Though using literals for arguments as suggested below is also harmless.)

For example, do not use count * size as an argument, as in:

foo = kmalloc(count * size, GFP_KERNEL);

Instead, the 2-factor form of the allocator should be used:

foo = kmalloc_array(count, size, GFP_KERNEL);

If no 2-factor form is available, the saturate-on-overflow helpers should be used:

bar = vmalloc(array_size(count, size));

Another common case to avoid is calculating the size of a structure with a trailing array of others structures, as in:

header = kzalloc(sizeof(*header) + count * sizeof(*header->item),

Instead, use the helper:

header = kzalloc(struct_size(header, item, count), GFP_KERNEL);

See array_size(), array3_size(), and struct_size(), for more details as well as the related check_add_overflow() and check_mul_overflow() family of functions.

simple_strtol(), simple_strtoll(), simple_strtoul(), simple_strtoull()

The simple_strtol(), simple_strtoll(), simple_strtoul(), and simple_strtoull() functions explicitly ignore overflows, which may lead to unexpected results in callers. The respective kstrtol(), kstrtoll(), kstrtoul(), and kstrtoull() functions tend to be the correct replacements, though note that those require the string to be NUL or newline terminated.


strcpy() performs no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This could result in linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of misbehaviors. While CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y and various compiler flags help reduce the risk of using this function, there is no good reason to add new uses of this function. The safe replacement is strscpy().

strncpy() on NUL-terminated strings

Use of strncpy() does not guarantee that the destination buffer will be NUL terminated. This can lead to various linear read overflows and other misbehavior due to the missing termination. It also NUL-pads the destination buffer if the source contents are shorter than the destination buffer size, which may be a needless performance penalty for callers using only NUL-terminated strings. The safe replacement is strscpy(). (Users of strscpy() still needing NUL-padding should instead use strscpy_pad().)

If a caller is using non-NUL-terminated strings, strncpy()() can still be used, but destinations should be marked with the __nonstring attribute to avoid future compiler warnings.


strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first, possibly exceeding the given limit of bytes to copy. This is inefficient and can lead to linear read overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated. The safe replacement is strscpy().

%p format specifier

Traditionally, using “%p” in format strings would lead to regular address exposure flaws in dmesg, proc, sysfs, etc. Instead of leaving these to be exploitable, all “%p” uses in the kernel are being printed as a hashed value, rendering them unusable for addressing. New uses of “%p” should not be added to the kernel. For text addresses, using “%pS” is likely better, as it produces the more useful symbol name instead. For nearly everything else, just do not add “%p” at all.

Paraphrasing Linus’s current guidance:

  • If the hashed “%p” value is pointless, ask yourself whether the pointer itself is important. Maybe it should be removed entirely?
  • If you really think the true pointer value is important, why is some system state or user privilege level considered “special”? If you think you can justify it (in comments and commit log) well enough to stand up to Linus’s scrutiny, maybe you can use “%px”, along with making sure you have sensible permissions.

And finally, know that a toggle for “%p” hashing will not be accepted.

Variable Length Arrays (VLAs)

Using stack VLAs produces much worse machine code than statically sized stack arrays. While these non-trivial performance issues are reason enough to eliminate VLAs, they are also a security risk. Dynamic growth of a stack array may exceed the remaining memory in the stack segment. This could lead to a crash, possible overwriting sensitive contents at the end of the stack (when built without CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y), or overwriting memory adjacent to the stack (when built without CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y)

Implicit switch case fall-through

The C language allows switch cases to fall through to the next case when a “break” statement is missing at the end of a case. This, however, introduces ambiguity in the code, as it’s not always clear if the missing break is intentional or a bug. For example, it’s not obvious just from looking at the code if STATE_ONE is intentionally designed to fall through into STATE_TWO:

switch (value) {
        WARN("unknown state");

As there have been a long list of flaws due to missing “break” statements, we no longer allow implicit fall-through. In order to identify intentional fall-through cases, we have adopted a pseudo-keyword macro “fallthrough” which expands to gcc’s extension __attribute__((__fallthrough__)). (When the C17/C18 [[fallthrough]] syntax is more commonly supported by C compilers, static analyzers, and IDEs, we can switch to using that syntax for the macro pseudo-keyword.)

All switch/case blocks must end in one of:

  • break;
  • fallthrough;
  • continue;
  • goto <label>;
  • return [expression];