Page migration allows the moving of the physical location of pages between nodes in a numa system while the process is running. This means that the virtual addresses that the process sees do not change. However, the system rearranges the physical location of those pages.
The main intend of page migration is to reduce the latency of memory access by moving pages near to the processor where the process accessing that memory is running.
Page migration allows a process to manually relocate the node on which its
pages are located through the MF_MOVE and MF_MOVE_ALL options while setting
a new memory policy via mbind(). The pages of process can also be relocated
from another process using the sys_migrate_pages() function call. The
migrate_pages function call takes two sets of nodes and moves pages of a
process that are located on the from nodes to the destination nodes.
Page migration functions are provided by the numactl package by Andi Kleen
(a version later than 0.9.3 is required. Get it from
ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/). numactl provides libnuma
which provides an interface similar to other numa functionality for page
/proc/<pid>/numa_maps allows an easy review of where the
pages of a process are located. See also the numa_maps documentation in the
proc(5) man page.
Manual migration is useful if for example the scheduler has relocated a process to a processor on a distant node. A batch scheduler or an administrator may detect the situation and move the pages of the process nearer to the new processor. The kernel itself does only provide manual page migration support. Automatic page migration may be implemented through user space processes that move pages. A special function call “move_pages” allows the moving of individual pages within a process. A NUMA profiler may f.e. obtain a log showing frequent off node accesses and may use the result to move pages to more advantageous locations.
Larger installations usually partition the system using cpusets into sections of nodes. Paul Jackson has equipped cpusets with the ability to move pages when a task is moved to another cpuset (See Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cpusets.rst). Cpusets allows the automation of process locality. If a task is moved to a new cpuset then also all its pages are moved with it so that the performance of the process does not sink dramatically. Also the pages of processes in a cpuset are moved if the allowed memory nodes of a cpuset are changed.
Page migration allows the preservation of the relative location of pages within a group of nodes for all migration techniques which will preserve a particular memory allocation pattern generated even after migrating a process. This is necessary in order to preserve the memory latencies. Processes will run with similar performance after migration.
Page migration occurs in several steps. First a high level description for those trying to use migrate_pages() from the kernel (for userspace usage see the Andi Kleen’s numactl package mentioned above) and then a low level description of how the low level details work.
In kernel use of migrate_pages()¶
Remove pages from the LRU.
Lists of pages to be migrated are generated by scanning over pages and moving them into lists. This is done by calling isolate_lru_page(). Calling isolate_lru_page increases the references to the page so that it cannot vanish while the page migration occurs. It also prevents the swapper or other scans to encounter the page.
We need to have a function of type new_page_t that can be passed to migrate_pages(). This function should figure out how to allocate the correct new page given the old page.
The migrate_pages() function is called which attempts to do the migration. It will call the function to allocate the new page for each page that is considered for moving.
How migrate_pages() works¶
migrate_pages() does several passes over its list of pages. A page is moved if all references to a page are removable at the time. The page has already been removed from the LRU via isolate_lru_page() and the refcount is increased so that the page cannot be freed while page migration occurs.
- Lock the page to be migrated
- Ensure that writeback is complete.
- Lock the new page that we want to move to. It is locked so that accesses to this (not yet uptodate) page immediately lock while the move is in progress.
- All the page table references to the page are converted to migration entries. This decreases the mapcount of a page. If the resulting mapcount is not zero then we do not migrate the page. All user space processes that attempt to access the page will now wait on the page lock.
- The i_pages lock is taken. This will cause all processes trying to access the page via the mapping to block on the spinlock.
- The refcount of the page is examined and we back out if references remain otherwise we know that we are the only one referencing this page.
- The radix tree is checked and if it does not contain the pointer to this page then we back out because someone else modified the radix tree.
- The new page is prepped with some settings from the old page so that accesses to the new page will discover a page with the correct settings.
- The radix tree is changed to point to the new page.
- The reference count of the old page is dropped because the address space reference is gone. A reference to the new page is established because the new page is referenced by the address space.
- The i_pages lock is dropped. With that lookups in the mapping become possible again. Processes will move from spinning on the lock to sleeping on the locked new page.
- The page contents are copied to the new page.
- The remaining page flags are copied to the new page.
- The old page flags are cleared to indicate that the page does not provide any information anymore.
- Queued up writeback on the new page is triggered.
- If migration entries were page then replace them with real ptes. Doing so will enable access for user space processes not already waiting for the page lock.
- The page locks are dropped from the old and new page. Processes waiting on the page lock will redo their page faults and will reach the new page.
- The new page is moved to the LRU and can be scanned by the swapper etc again.
Non-LRU page migration¶
Although original migration aimed for reducing the latency of memory access for NUMA, compaction who want to create high-order page is also main customer.
Current problem of the implementation is that it is designed to migrate only LRU pages. However, there are potential non-lru pages which can be migrated in drivers, for example, zsmalloc, virtio-balloon pages.
For virtio-balloon pages, some parts of migration code path have been hooked up and added virtio-balloon specific functions to intercept migration logics. It’s too specific to a driver so other drivers who want to make their pages movable would have to add own specific hooks in migration path.
To overclome the problem, VM supports non-LRU page migration which provides generic functions for non-LRU movable pages without driver specific hooks migration path.
If a driver want to make own pages movable, it should define three functions which are function pointers of struct address_space_operations.
bool (*isolate_page) (struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode);
What VM expects on isolate_page function of driver is to return true if driver isolates page successfully. On returing true, VM marks the page as PG_isolated so concurrent isolation in several CPUs skip the page for isolation. If a driver cannot isolate the page, it should return false.
Once page is successfully isolated, VM uses page.lru fields so driver shouldn’t expect to preserve values in that fields.
int (*migratepage) (struct address_space *mapping,
struct page *newpage, struct page *oldpage, enum migrate_mode);
After isolation, VM calls migratepage of driver with isolated page. The function of migratepage is to move content of the old page to new page and set up fields of struct page newpage. Keep in mind that you should indicate to the VM the oldpage is no longer movable via __ClearPageMovable() under page_lock if you migrated the oldpage successfully and returns MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS. If driver cannot migrate the page at the moment, driver can return -EAGAIN. On -EAGAIN, VM will retry page migration in a short time because VM interprets -EAGAIN as “temporal migration failure”. On returning any error except -EAGAIN, VM will give up the page migration without retrying in this time.
Driver shouldn’t touch page.lru field VM using in the functions.
void (*putback_page)(struct page *);
If migration fails on isolated page, VM should return the isolated page to the driver so VM calls driver’s putback_page with migration failed page. In this function, driver should put the isolated page back to the own data structure.
non-lru movable page flags
There are two page flags for supporting non-lru movable page.
Driver should use the below function to make page movable under page_lock:
void __SetPageMovable(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping)
It needs argument of address_space for registering migration family functions which will be called by VM. Exactly speaking, PG_movable is not a real flag of struct page. Rather than, VM reuses page->mapping’s lower bits to represent it.
- #define PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE 0x2 page->mapping = page->mapping | PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE;
so driver shouldn’t access page->mapping directly. Instead, driver should use page_mapping which mask off the low two bits of page->mapping under page lock so it can get right struct address_space.
For testing of non-lru movable page, VM supports __PageMovable function. However, it doesn’t guarantee to identify non-lru movable page because page->mapping field is unified with other variables in struct page. As well, if driver releases the page after isolation by VM, page->mapping doesn’t have stable value although it has PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE (Look at __ClearPageMovable). But __PageMovable is cheap to catch whether page is LRU or non-lru movable once the page has been isolated. Because LRU pages never can have PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE in page->mapping. It is also good for just peeking to test non-lru movable pages before more expensive checking with lock_page in pfn scanning to select victim.
For guaranteeing non-lru movable page, VM provides PageMovable function. Unlike __PageMovable, PageMovable functions validates page->mapping and mapping->a_ops->isolate_page under lock_page. The lock_page prevents sudden destroying of page->mapping.
Driver using __SetPageMovable should clear the flag via __ClearMovablePage under page_lock before the releasing the page.
To prevent concurrent isolation among several CPUs, VM marks isolated page as PG_isolated under lock_page. So if a CPU encounters PG_isolated non-lru movable page, it can skip it. Driver doesn’t need to manipulate the flag because VM will set/clear it automatically. Keep in mind that if driver sees PG_isolated page, it means the page have been isolated by VM so it shouldn’t touch page.lru field. PG_isolated is alias with PG_reclaim flag so driver shouldn’t use the flag for own purpose.
The following events (counters) can be used to monitor page migration.
- PGMIGRATE_SUCCESS: Normal page migration success. Each count means that a page was migrated. If the page was a non-THP page, then this counter is increased by one. If the page was a THP, then this counter is increased by the number of THP subpages. For example, migration of a single 2MB THP that has 4KB-size base pages (subpages) will cause this counter to increase by 512.
- PGMIGRATE_FAIL: Normal page migration failure. Same counting rules as for _SUCCESS, above: this will be increased by the number of subpages, if it was a THP.
- THP_MIGRATION_SUCCESS: A THP was migrated without being split.
- THP_MIGRATION_FAIL: A THP could not be migrated nor it could be split.
- THP_MIGRATION_SPLIT: A THP was migrated, but not as such: first, the THP had to be split. After splitting, a migration retry was used for it’s sub-pages.
THP_MIGRATION_* events also update the appropriate PGMIGRATE_SUCCESS or PGMIGRATE_FAIL events. For example, a THP migration failure will cause both THP_MIGRATION_FAIL and PGMIGRATE_FAIL to increase.
Christoph Lameter, May 8, 2006. Minchan Kim, Mar 28, 2016.