home   contributing   bugs   download   online pages  

NAME | SYNOPSIS | DESCRIPTION | RETURN VALUE | ERRORS | CONFORMING TO | NOTES | BUGS | SEE ALSO | COLOPHONThe Linux Programming Interface


ACCESS(2)                     Linux Programmer's Manual                     ACCESS(2)

NAME         top

       access - check real user's permissions for a file

SYNOPSIS         top

       #include <unistd.h>

       int access(const char *pathname, int mode);

DESCRIPTION         top

       access() checks whether the calling process can access the file pathname.  If
       pathname is a symbolic link, it is dereferenced.

       The mode specifies the accessibility check(s) to be performed, and is either
       the value F_OK, or a mask consisting of the bitwise OR of one or more of R_OK,
       W_OK, and X_OK.  F_OK tests for the existence of the file.  R_OK, W_OK, and
       X_OK test whether the file exists and grants read, write, and execute
       permissions, respectively.

       The check is done using the calling process's real UID and GID, rather than
       the effective IDs as is done when actually attempting an operation (e.g.,
       open(2)) on the file.  This allows set-user-ID programs to easily determine
       the invoking user's authority.

       If the calling process is privileged (i.e., its real UID is zero), then an
       X_OK check is successful for a regular file if execute permission is enabled
       for any of the file owner, group, or other.

RETURN VALUE         top

       On success (all requested permissions granted), zero is returned.  On error
       (at least one bit in mode asked for a permission that is denied, or some other
       error occurred), -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.

ERRORS         top

       access() shall fail if:

       EACCES The requested access would be denied to the file, or search permission
              is denied for one of the directories in the path prefix of pathname.
              (See also path_resolution(7).)

       ELOOP  Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving pathname.

       ENAMETOOLONG
              pathname is too long.

       ENOENT A component of pathname does not exist or is a dangling symbolic link.

       ENOTDIR
              A component used as a directory in pathname is not, in fact, a
              directory.

       EROFS  Write permission was requested for a file on a read-only file system.

       access() may fail if:

       EFAULT pathname points outside your accessible address space.

       EINVAL mode was incorrectly specified.

       EIO    An I/O error occurred.

       ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available.

       ETXTBSY
              Write access was requested to an executable which is being executed.

CONFORMING TO         top

       SVr4, 4.3BSD, POSIX.1-2001.

NOTES         top

       Warning: Using access() to check if a user is authorized to, for example, open
       a file before actually doing so using open(2) creates a security hole, because
       the user might exploit the short time interval between checking and opening
       the file to manipulate it.  For this reason, the use of this system call
       should be avoided.  (In the example just described, a safer alternative would
       be to temporarily switch the process's effective user ID to the real ID and
       then call open(2).)

       access() always dereferences symbolic links.  If you need to check the
       permissions on a symbolic link, use faccessat(2) with the flag
       AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW.

       access() returns an error if any of the access types in mode is denied, even
       if some of the other access types in mode are permitted.

       If the calling process has appropriate privileges (i.e., is superuser),
       POSIX.1-2001 permits an implementation to indicate success for an X_OK check
       even if none of the execute file permission bits are set.  Linux does not do
       this.

       A file is only accessible if the permissions on each of the directories in the
       path prefix of pathname grant search (i.e., execute) access.  If any directory
       is inaccessible, then the access() call will fail, regardless of the
       permissions on the file itself.

       Only access bits are checked, not the file type or contents.  Therefore, if a
       directory is found to be writable, it probably means that files can be created
       in the directory, and not that the directory can be written as a file.
       Similarly, a DOS file may be found to be "executable," but the execve(2) call
       will still fail.

       access() may not work correctly on NFS file systems with UID mapping enabled,
       because UID mapping is done on the server and hidden from the client, which
       checks permissions.

BUGS         top

       In kernel 2.4 (and earlier) there is some strangeness in the handling of X_OK
       tests for superuser.  If all categories of execute permission are disabled for
       a nondirectory file, then the only access() test that returns -1 is when mode
       is specified as just X_OK; if R_OK or W_OK is also specified in mode, then
       access() returns 0 for such files.  Early 2.6 kernels (up to and including
       2.6.3) also behaved in the same way as kernel 2.4.

       In kernels before 2.6.20, access() ignored the effect of the MS_NOEXEC flag if
       it was used to mount(2) the underlying file system.  Since kernel 2.6.20,
       access() honors this flag.

SEE ALSO         top

       chmod(2), chown(2), faccessat(2), open(2), setgid(2), setuid(2), stat(2),
       euidaccess(3), credentials(7), path_resolution(7)

COLOPHON         top

       This page is part of release 3.32 of the Linux man-pages project.  A
       description of the project, and information about reporting bugs, can be found
       at http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/.

Linux                                 2010-10-24                            ACCESS(2)

HTML rendering created 2010-12-03 by Michael Kerrisk, author of The Linux Programming Interface

customisable
counter